
Mission Vista Science Fair
January 22, 2021
MVA Science & Engineering Fair January 22, 2021
Participation Survey
Grades 4th -10th Grades
Platforms
Dates for County Fair
Categories 2021
Consent Forms Needed For...
Human participants
Model Rockets
Fungi/Molds
Biohazards
Judging Standards
1. Project Creativity
a. Originality of the problem, uniqueness of approach and interpretation of data should be commensurate with the student’s grade level. Ingenious use of equipment and materials is considered regardless of the expense of the items involved.
2. Scientific Thought/Engineering Project Goals/Mathematics and Computer Project Goals
a. Scientific Method/Process:
i. The project shows depth of study and effort in employing scientific
procedures/protocols in the solution of a clearly defined problem (including
background study, organized procedures, appropriate sampling, orderly
recording and analysis of data and the formulation of logical conclusions).
b. Engineering Project Goals:
i. The project has a clear objective relevant to the needs of the potential user. The product or process has been tested and is both workable and feasible
economically and ecologically.
c. Mathematics and Computer Project Goals:
i. The project has a clear objective, has been thoroughly tested and the process is well documented to both practical and workable outcome(s).
3. Thoroughness
a. The study is complete within the scope of the problem. Scientific literature has been searched, experiments repeated and careful records kept. And given credit when citation is needed.
4. Skills
a. Credit is given for special skills needed for the construction or use of equipment and for mathematical, computational, observational, and design skills.
5. Clarity
a. The purpose, procedures and conclusions are clearly explained orally and through the display. The DIGITAL RESEARCH NOTEBOOK is well organized, neat and accurate. Sources of ideas, data, and assistance are clearly identified.
Items to be judged:
1. Video Presentation
2. Digital Display Board
3. Digital Research Notebook
4. Project Abstract
Video Presentation & Judging Questions
Video Presentation with Judging Questions
Here is your chance to tell the judges about your project. Present your summary on the important points of your project. Be sure to present a clear and organized video.
Video Presentation Time Limits:
• Elementary Division (Grades 4 & 5): 3 to 5 minutes
• Junior Division (Grades 6 to 8): 4 to 6 minutes
• Senior Division (Grades 9 to 12): 5 to 8 minutes
During your video presentation you will need to answer the following questions for the judges:
1. Where did you get the idea for your project?
2. What interests you the most about the subject you chose?
3. Why is your project important in today's society? (How will it help people today?)
4. In general, what were your results and conclusions?
Here are additional questions you can answer within your video presentation: 1. What special skills or equipment did you have to learn to use to develop your project? 2. What is special or distinctive about your project?
3. Explain briefly and simply the goal of your project.
4. Explain why you formulated your particular hypothesis.
5. Were you able to support your hypothesis? Explain.
6. What are some possible sources of error in your project?
7. If you were to do this again, what would you do differently?
8. Is there a practical application for the information you gained from this experiment? If so, what is it?
9. What problems did you encounter in developing and/or conducting your experiment? How did you overcome them?
10. In your research, what did you find that was already known about your project? 11. What resources did you use to acquire the information you needed to set up your project?
12. What questions, if any, were created as a result of your work?
13. What are the three most interesting things you learned when doing this project?
Judging Criteria
Research Question/Problem – 10 points
Research Question
• Clear and focused purposed
• Identifies contribution to the field of study • Testable using scientific methods
Design and Methodology
• Well-designed and data collection methods • Variables and controls defined, appropriate and complete
Execution: Data Collection, Analysis and Interpretation • Systematic data collection and analysis
• Reproducibility of results
• Appropriate application of mathematics and statistical methods
• Sufficient data collected to support interpretation and conclusions/claim
• Appropriate control of variables
• Scientific/Engineering Journal to support the research
Research Question
• Description of a practical need or problem to be solved
• Definition of criteria for proposed solution
• Explanation of constraints
Design and Methodology – 15 points
Design and Methodology
• Exploration of alternatives to answer need or problem
• Identification of a solution
• Development of a prototype/model
Execution – 20 points
Execution: Construction and Testing • Prototype demonstrates intended design
• Prototype has been tested in multiple conditions/trials
• Prototype demonstrates engineering skill and completeness
• Scientific/Engineering Journal to support the research
Research Question
The project had a clear objective
Design and Methodology
• The project had a clear objective
• The project was an improvement over current computer science inquiry
• For projects in theoretical computer science – The project involved creating/writing a new mathematical algorithm to solve a problem in programming
• For projects in applied computer science - The student/team created a simulation or a model, using computer science to explain, demonstrate, or make understandable existing scientific understanding
• For projects in theoretical mathematics - The student/team understood the project’s potential applications
• For projects in applied mathematics - The student/team understood the underlying mathematical theory
Execution: Construction and Testing
• Was the software or hardware prototype
to be invented/engineered relevant,
workable and feasible
• Explanation of method of debugging program
• The mathematical approach (proofs,
graphs, formulas, etc.) was clearly
explained
Creativity – 20 points
Creativity
• Project demonstrates significant creativity in one or more of the above criteria
Digital Display Board
• Logical organization of material
• Clarity of graphics and legends
• Supporting documentation displayed
Video Presentation
• Clear, Concise thoughtful response to questions • Understanding of basic science relevant to the project
• Understanding, interpretation and limitations of project outcomes and consequences
• Degree of independence in conducting project • Recognition of potential impact in science, society, and/or economics
• Quality of ideas for future research
• For team projects, contributions to and understanding of project by all members
Digital Display Board – 10 points
Digital Display Board
• Logical organization of material • Clarity of graphics and legends
• Supporting documentation displayed
Video Presentation – 25 points
Video Presentation
• Clear, Concise thoughtful response to questions
• Understanding of basic relevant to the project
• Understanding, interpretation and limitations of project outcomes and consequences
• Degree of independence in conducting project
• Recognition of potential impact in science, society, and/or economics • Quality of ideas for future research
• For team projects, contributions to and understanding of project by all
members
Creativity
• The student/team showed creativity in
choosing the problem and/or the
methodology used
Digital Display Board
• Logical organization of material
• Clarity of graphics and legends
• Supporting documentation displayed
Hope Cutter
Email: hope.cutter@missionvistaacademy.org
Phone: (951)3166783